Part 2: Simon Spots a Hook or How 'Larry Stylinson' Was Born

Follow up to Simon Cowell: Here we go again

Part 2: Simon Spots a Hook or How 'Larry Stylinson' Was Born
Simon Spots a Hook by Sky Burton

Simon Cowell’s career has always been about turning something raw and chaotic into spectacle, even if it’s cheap, exploitative, or harmful. With the Teletubbies he proved to himself and the industry that spectacle doesn’t need depth. You can sell something ridiculous if you package it right.

Later came UK's Pop Idol (2001-2003), then American Idol (2002-2010), before launching The X Factor UK (2004-2018) and BGT (2007-present) alongside his own company Syco, followed by X Factor US (2011-2013) and America's Got Talent (2016-present).  He knew he could do the same thing with the right type of boyband - One Direction - five inexperienced, wide-eyed teenage boys. They may not have had experience, but they had chemistry and energy, and Simon would soon discover the magic hook, that one thing.

The Hook: Harry and Louis

Harry and Louis’s early closeness was obvious. It was natural, unforced, and visible. They clicked instantly on X Factor. Whether that was a genuine deep friendship, romantic spark, or simply teenage bonding, it didn’t matter. It gave Cowell something he thrives on, narrative fuel.

Cowell has always understood that the story sells as much as the music. For Will Young (during Cowell’s Pop Idol days) it was his “everyman authenticity.” For Leona Lewis it was her Cinderella rise. For One Direction, the hook was the boys’ relationships, not just with fans, but with each other.

The Larry narrative fit neatly into the formula. It was ambiguous enough to stir speculation, emotional enough to keep fans hooked, and dramatic enough to create endless online chatter. Whether or not there was truth to it, simply didn’t matter. He needed spectacle. Cowell saw Harry and Louis’s bond as exploitable.

One Direction were kids; he was a veteran in manipulating narratives. That imbalance made them and their fans easy targets.

The seed of Larry Stylinson was planted in October 2010.

And so, the seed of Larry Stylinson was planted. Was it a deep friendship? Was it something more? It didn’t matter. The ambiguity was the hook. And Simon Cowell knew exactly how to feed it, just enough to keep fans obsessed, never enough to resolve it. Typical fanfic angst. Was it real? Was it not? Was it being suppressed? Were they being kept apart? The truth never mattered. The blurred line between truth and fantasy kept fans engaged, buying tickets, creating content, and living inside the narrative. It was a marketing machine powered by ambiguity.

Cowell’s genius (if you can call emotional exploitation that) has always been the same: take something organic, strip it of its humanity, and sell it as spectacle. Fans still argue today over whether Larry was real, fake, or somewhere in between. But from Cowell’s perspective, it didn’t matter. The story itself was the product.

Cowell learned early that the public will buy almost anything if you give them a hook. Simon Cowell didn’t need to tell the truth. He only needed to feed the fantasy.

But, why did Cowell keep it going after the hiatus?  As long as the machine was making money it was continued. It didn't really take much because the story had taken on a life of its own. Remember, this has absolutely nothing to do with truth. This was a fan manipulation strategy from the start. From there it became a self-propelled rollercoaster. There were narratives fighting each other all along which simply continued the chaos which was valuable engagement and kept the stories going.

Did contracts end? Did Simon get bored and move on to his next project with Netflix?  No doubt something changed in September 2025, and several things can be true at once. Is the fan base being broken up deliberately or is the story just coming to a close to make way for a new one?

But how (technically) did it continue? There were too many moving parts, there were too many photos and timelines and games. How could it possibly have been manipulated? Technology, PR, and algorithms.